Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Directed Graph Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia: A Comparison to Established Mapping Techniques

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

DGM is a rapid automated algorithm that has a strong level of agreement with TM for manually re-annotated VT maps.

Study context

Population
Patients with structural heart disease undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation with entrainment-proven critical isthmus and high-density electroanatomical activation map7 focal, 28 re-entrant
Participants
35 patients
Comparison
Directed graph mapping (DGM) and automated conduction velocity mapping (ACVM) vs traditional mapping
Outcome
Ability to identify VT mechanism, characterize VT circuit and locate critical isthmus
Methodological detailsretrospective case series
  • Retrospective case series

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Agreement with TM for VT mechanism and circuit type; isthmus identification
Test or modelKappa vs traditional mapping (TM)Putative isthmus identified (re-entrant)Focal activation correctly identified
DGM0.79; P < 0.0125 (89%)all cases
ACVM0.66; P < 0.0125 (89%)all cases

Kappa vs traditional mapping (TM)

DGM0.79; P < 0.01
ACVM0.66; P < 0.01

Putative isthmus identified (re-entrant)

DGM25 (89%)
ACVM25 (89%)

Focal activation correctly identified

DGMall cases
ACVMall cases

Original publication

Directed Graph Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia: A Comparison to Established Mapping Techniques. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 26 October 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.013

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.