Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Impact of vagal effect on atrial and ventricular refractoriness and atrial fibrillation: A comparative analysis before and after cardioneuroablation

Heart RhythmPublished Mechanistic study

Authors' conclusion

Vagal activation is a potent atrial AF trigger, whereas ventricular refractoriness remains unchanged facing ECVS and/or CNA, underscoring chamber-specific autonomic effects and supporting the electrophysiological safety of ECVS and of CNA.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing cardioneuroablation (CNA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) (with pulmonary vein isolation) or reflex syncope
Participants
89 consecutive patients
Comparison
Extracardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) before vs after cardioneuroablation
  • Paroxysmal AFn = 76
  • Reflex syncopen = 13
Outcome
AERP and VERP at baseline, during ECVS, after CNA, and after CNA during ECVS
Methodological detailsconsecutive patients, paired comparison
  • Consecutive patients
  • Paired comparison

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Right atrial AERP shortened with ECVS: 213.8 ± 25 to 100.6 ± 33 ms
P < .001
Left atrial AERP shortened with ECVS: 235.2 ± 32 to 143.3 ± 32 ms
P < .001
Ventricular effective refractory periods (VERP) in both ventricles unchanged across all stages
P > .13

Further findings

AF inducibility (vagal AF induction test)

Baseline
3.4%
During ECVS
95.5%
During ECVS after CNA
7.9%
Cochran's Q
P < 0.00001
McNemar
P < 0.00001

Original publication

Impact of vagal effect on atrial and ventricular refractoriness and atrial fibrillation: A comparative analysis before and after cardioneuroablation. Heart Rhythm. Published 13 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.011

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.