Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Long-term risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device reinterventions following external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: A nationwide cohort study

Heart RhythmPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

ECV in patients with a CIED is associated with a higher risk of generator replacement and lead reintervention. The risks of reinterventions were more pronounced within the first year after cardioversion.

Study context

Population
Patients with a CIED (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), CRT-P or CRT-D) undergoing external cardioversion (ECV) for AF or flutter, Danish nationwide registries
Participants
2,582 vs 12,910
Exposure
ECV-exposed vs matched CIED generators/leads without ECV
  • ECV-exposedn = 2,582
  • Matchedn = 12,910reference
Outcome
Generator replacement and lead reintervention
Follow-up
2 years
Methodological detailsnationwide, matched, registry-based
  • Nationwide
  • Matched
  • Registry-based

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

2 years

ECV-exposed

Generator replacement
210 (8.1%)
Lead reintervention
247 (5.6%)

Matched

Generator replacement
670 (5.2%)
Lead reintervention
306 (2.3%)

Generator replacement

ECV-exposed210 (8.1%)
Matched670 (5.2%)

Lead reintervention

ECV-exposed247 (5.6%)
Matched306 (2.3%)
ECV-exposed vs MatchedHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
Generator replacement, unadjusted
1.61(1.37–1.91)
P < 0.001
Lead reintervention, unadjusted
2.39(2.01–2.85)
P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeRR (95% CI)P value
Generator replacement and lead reintervention, relative risks · 1 year and 2 yearsECV-exposedvs Matched1-year, generator replacement1.73 (1.41–2.12)P < 0.001
Generator replacement and lead reintervention, relative risks · 1 year and 2 yearsECV-exposedvs Matched1-year, lead reintervention2.85 (2.32–3.51)P < 0.001
Generator replacement and lead reintervention, relative risks · 1 year and 2 yearsECV-exposedvs Matched2-year, generator replacement1.39 (1.19–1.63)P < 0.001
Generator replacement and lead reintervention, relative risks · 1 year and 2 yearsECV-exposedvs Matched2-year, lead reintervention2.18 (1.84–2.57)P < 0.001

Original publication

Long-term risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device reinterventions following external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: A nationwide cohort study. Heart Rhythm. Published 23 March 2023. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.024

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.