Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification in patients with myocardial scarring and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction

Heart RhythmPublished Prognostic cohort study

Authors' conclusion

PVS is a useful tool to discriminate patients with myocardial scar and LVEF of ≥40% at an increased arrhythmic risk.

Study context

Population
Patients with myocardial scarring and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS)
Participants
168 patients
Comparison
Positive vs negative PVS
  • Positive PVSn = 21
Outcome
Major arrhythmic event:
  • SCD
  • VT/VF
  • Appropriate ICD therapy
Follow-up
Mean 46 ± 38 months

Performance

As reported in the abstract

MAE
Test or modelValuePPVSensitivityNPVSpecificity
Positive PVS43%43%69%
Negative PVS2.7%97%92%

Value

Positive PVS43%
Negative PVS2.7%

PPV

Positive PVS43%
Negative PVS— not stated in the abstract

Sensitivity

Positive PVS69%
Negative PVS— not stated in the abstract

NPV

Positive PVS— not stated in the abstract
Negative PVS97%

Specificity

Positive PVS— not stated in the abstract
Negative PVS92%

Original publication

Programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification in patients with myocardial scarring and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm. Published 11 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.014

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.